Single-Sex Schools Fail to Improve Learning Essay

In 2002, only close a dozen schools were separating the raisees, according to the depicted object Association for Single Sex unrestricted Education, an advocacy group. Now, an estimated 500 humanity schools across the country offer some all-boy and all-girl classrooms. 2Proponents plead the separation allows for a tailored breeding and cuts down on sex-driven distractions among boys and girls, such as flirting. But critics decry the movement as promoting harmful sexual urge stereotypes and depriving kids of equal pedagogyal opportunities.The ACLU claims m some(prenominal) schools offer the classes in a way that conflicts with the U. S. Constitution and Title IX, a federal law banning sex discrimination in education. Researchers also turn over weighed in. 3For many p arnts, the rationale for placing their child in a single-sex school is the belief that academician performance will be improved. upstart research finds an absence seizure of evidence to attendant this assum ption. Moreover, evidence does exist that sex segregation increases gender stereotyping among children and teachers and legitimizes institutional sexism.4The findings are the crux of the matter of a new article in the journal Science that examines single-sex schooling. Though public sentiment may have reinforced in ache of such settings for up(a) the instruction environment and outcomes for both boys and girls, the apprehension is just non there to support this, said Richard Fabes, Ph. D. , one of the authors of the Science article. 5The hold authors cite evidence that single-sex and co-ed outcomes are equal.Similar large-scale reviews in expectant Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand found little general difference between single-sex and mixed-sex academic outcomes. emit to our students and our graduates and theyll tell you well-nigh the value of asking in an environment where competitive and conjunctive spirits are unleashed in the absence of gender-based expec tations. 6An opposite misconception rebutted in the article is the claim that boys and girls learn differently.Study authors said that this premise is not supported by research as neuroscientists have found few differences in childrens brains beyond the larger gaudiness of boys brains and the earlier completion of girls brain egress neither of which is known to relate to learning. 7Critics of single-sex education argue that socializing, especially between genders, should be an integral part of education. Positive and cooperative interaction with members of other sex is an useful method for improving intergroup relationships, according to the authors.8On the other hand, an influential conservative political movement, equal by the presidency of Ronald Reagan public concerns about sexual freedom a jump out in unmarriedparticularly teenaged pregnancy and the growth of sexually transmissible diseases led to a reexamination of coeducational policies. There is evidence, however, t hat sex segregation increases gender divisions among children. Separating boys and girls in public school classrooms makes gender very salient, and this salience reinforces stereotypes and sexism, Fabes said.9Moreover, for both girls and boys co-education provides a more realistic way of bringing up young people to take their places by nature in the wider community of men and women. It helps to shock down the misconceptions of each sex about the other and provides an excellent foundation for the exploitation of realistic, meaningful and lasting relationships in ulterior life. 10The authors note that research has shown that labeling and segregation of any form be it, gender, eye color, or randomly assigned T-shirt groups is injurious as this implies that the groups differ in authoritative ways which may lead to the growing of bias.Is it ever good to segregate on the basis of race, income or age? I think the answer is no, Fabes said. There is no good evidence that it is ever a good time to separate and segregate. both form of segregation undermines rather than promotes equality. cite Arizona State University http//psychcentral. com/news/2011/09/23/single-sex-schools-fail-to-improve-learning/29723. html generators Arguments Counterarguments Writers Refutation